Connected to the increasing awareness of climate urgency, there are many sustainability-related topics, phrases, and abbreviations that have emerged. One of them is GRI which stands for the Global Reporting Initiative. This article aims to give a brief overview of GRI and its Standards, as well as explain its popularity.
As already mentioned, human impact on the natural environment is becoming impossible to ignore, while COVID-19 reversed many years’ worth of social improvements across the planet. These have contributed to the ever-growing attention to societies´ sustainability efforts – both, from the public´s as well as regulators´ points of view. Businesses are increasingly being held accountable for their impacts and are expected to provide full transparency in acknowledging and managing those impacts.
This is where various frameworks and standards come to play, as they support disclosing non-financial, i.e., sustainability-related information in a comparable and uniform way. It may not come as a surprise that there are a wide array of such structures in place (many of them indicated below), all somewhat different in their approach, target sector, level of detail, scope, etc.
One such standard is developed by a Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and is called GRI Standards. GRI Standards were first launched in the year 2000 (then called GRI Guidelines). Since then, “the world’s first globally accepted standards for sustainability reporting” have received continuous evaluation and improvement in time and become the world leader among voluntary performance reporting programs. In 2020, 73% of the world´s 250 largest companies by revenue reported their non-financial information in accordance with the GRI Standards. Closer to home, companies using GRI Standards include Tele2, Stora Enso, Maxima, and AS Tallinna Vesi, to name a few.
Ever since the foundation of GRI, there has been two principal goals for the guidelines:
GRI Standards are issued by Global Sustainability Standards Board (GSSB) which is an independent multi-stakeholder standard-setting body, established by GRI. It ensures that the Standards are developed independently and in the public interest. To involve the considerations of different perspectives, the GRI Standards are developed by Expert Working Groups which represent various stakeholder groups such as civil society, business enterprises, labor organizations, etc.
Prior to the issuing of any new GRI Standard, its draft is released for public comment. It is exactly this thorough multistakeholder inclusion that has accompanied the Standards´ development since its beginning that has contributed to their completeness and facilitated dialogues across different participants of the society.
Having looked into the past, a brief overview of the GRI Standards is due. The Standards have a modular structure, consisting of Universal -, Sector -, and Topic Standards, all of which are freely accessible from the GRI website.
Universal Standards are applicable to all who wish to report in accordance with GRI Standards as they give an introduction to the Standards (GRI 1), list general disclosures for the reporting organization (GRI 2), and describe the selection process for material topics (GRI 3). “Material topic” is one of the central concepts of GRI Standards, and stands for “topics that represent the organization’s most significant impacts on the economy, environment, and people“, thus covering the most important ESG (Environment, Social, Governance) impacts.
Only after having identified the material topics (by using GRI 3: Material Topics 2021) can the reporting organization proceed with the Topic Standards. This module consists of separate standards – for example, „GRI 207: Tax 2019“, „GRI 302: Energy 2016“, and „GRI 401: Employment 2016“ – each containing disclosures relevant to the given topic. The organization is required to report only those disclosures which represent impacts related to its material topics.
Sector Standards list the topics which are likely to be material for an organization within the given sector. Currently, three sector standards have been published: for a) the oil and gas sector, b) the coal sector and c) agriculture, aquaculture and fishing sectors. Companies are required to use an applicable Sector Standard when available but still need to carry out the process of identifying its material topics.
The modular structure of GRI Standards enables an easier update of its individual parts and facilitates easier understanding of the entire system. Furthermore, by having a separate standard for each topic, the reporting is supported by a thorough context-specific recommendations and guidelines.
Acknowledging the different information needs of different stakeholders and wishing to extend its vision of uniformity beyond GRI Standards, GRI has collaborated with other sustainability disclosure frameworks and developed guidelines on how to use its standards together with other related initiatives. The examples include: “A Practical Guide to Sustainability Reporting Using GRI and SASB Standards” and “Linking GRI and CDP”. Such alignments enable organizations to follow multiple diclosure systems while keeping the additional efforts at a minimum.
Furthermore, in March 2021, GRI and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) announced their cooperation wherein GRI pledged to participate in the construction of European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) to be used when reporting under the European Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). GRI and ESRS alignment enables the thousands of European companies who already use GRI Standards to comply with ESRS more easily. Therefore, the use of GRI Standards also helps to navigate the ever-evolving legislative landscape.
In summary, GRI Standards have proven that the systematic communication of sustainability performance across a wide range of sectors and contexts is indeed possible. It is clear that GRI has had a significant impact on the field of sustainability disclosures and it is exciting to see where the new developments take us. After all – sustainable development rests on accountability which can only be enforced through transparency.